Let me state first and foremost that I genuinely love the Toy Story films and everything that Pixar does. They respect all of the aspects of a film as an art piece and their stories are always creative and smart as well as beautifully animated. All of those things being said, I have a two year old daughter, so I have seen each Toy Story film around a hundred times a piece. In these repeated viewings I’ve noticed some rather large plot holes that don’t really distract from the story so long as you suspend disbelief, enjoy the story, and aren’t a nutter… but are there there none the less.
#1: Buzz’s Willful Ignorance
Movie: Toy Story
Scene: The first three quarters of the movie
How is it that Buzz doesn’t notice that his wrist communicator is just a sticker? If he is the real Buzz Lightyear then he must be a person in a space suit. Does he not notice that he has no feeling of a body inside of the exterior suit since he is solid plastic? Why doesn’t he notice that his space ship is made from cardboard and lacks any kind of mechanical parts?
#2: How does Woody not know his origin?
Movie: Toy Story 2
Scene: The premise of the movie, primarily the scene where Woody finds out he is based on an old TV show called “Woody’s Roundup”.
In the second film we find out that Woody is a priceless antique. He is a licensed property based off of a presumably popular television show from decades ago. The show is called Woody’s Round Up and is in black and white and done with puppets (reminiscent of The Thunderbirds) so it’s safe to assume the show is from the 1950’s (particularly since it is stated that the show’s popularity waned because of the launch of Sputnik). We also know that the show’s popularity, though intense, is short lived because it was cancelled on a cliff hanger.
This makes for a limited window of time in which Woody could have been manufactured and sold. It also means that Woody is around 50 years old at. Andy’s mother states that he is a family heirloom, so he has to have had multiple owners yet he acts as though he doesn’t understand the idea of the child getting older and growing out of him. He has to have been handed down around 4 times. Does he not remember any of this? Why?
#3: Where does toy sentience begin and end?
Movie: All of them
Scene: All of them
This is the big one and perhaps the most insane for someone to be thinking about. We have seen multiple times that toys can be dismantled and remain sentient. Buzz loses his arm and doesn’t display any kind of pain. Woody also loses an arm. Toys can be broken and fixed without any real consequence to the toy’s “health” or “life”. Where does it end? The only time that any of the toy’s display pain is when Sid burns Woody with a magnifying glass and even then he’s able to remain inanimate. This one instance seems to contradict established cannon.
In the first film, Sid completely dismantles toys and puts them back together in different ways and they remain alive. Is he creating a new toy? A new consciousness? These are often made of different toys put together, which personality does that “new toy” have? Is the consciousness in the head? In the end of the third film when the toys are about to slide into the incinerator at the dump, they’ll be turned to ash, but since the toys have been dismantled without dying or displaying symptoms of pain it’s reasonable to assume that ash may still have some kind of sentience… that is a horrifying thought. How does a toy die?
Additionally there is the question of where the consciousness begins. If I make a paper doll is that doll alive? Does the act of drawing a face on paper make that face self aware? At what point during the manufacturing process do the toys become living?
#4: Woody can control the pull string talk box that’s in him… when it’s convenient to the plot.
Movie: Toy Story
Scene: Woody and Buzz are attempting to sneak down a hallway in Sid’s house quietly when Woody’s pull string gets caught on a piece of stair railing and activates the talk box, alerting the dog to their presence.
Okay basically just read the bit where I explained the scene right there. Why can’t Woody just make the talk box stop? It’s demonstrated later on when the toys are revolting against Sid that he has control over it whether the string is pulled or not.
#5: Why does Buzz go along with, what he interprets as, a pointless charade?
Movie: Toy Story
Scene: Most of the movie.
Why does Buzz “play along” with the idea that he’s inanimate in front of Andy if he believes that he is a space ranger? I mean, he believes that the fate of the entire universe relies on his getting off the planet quickly doesn't he?
#6: Illogical plans for plot's sake.
Movie: Toy Story 2
Scene: Whole movie.
It’s demonstrated in the first Toy Story that there’s really no adverse effects to revealing their sentience to a human. Why can’t this same plan apply to Al of Al’s Toy Barn in the second film? No one’s going to believe him and he’s alone in that store. I mean I know that as far as plot is concerned this would be repetitive but logically in the context of the film it would seem like it would be the most logical plan for the toys.
Well there you are. The observances of a crazy person with regards to the Toy Story franchise. I hope that you have enjoyed this list and that you can continue to enjoy these wonderful films despite my insanity.