Forward:
Let me state
first and foremost that I genuinely love the Toy Story films and everything
that Pixar does. They respect all of the aspects of a film as an art piece and
their stories are always creative and smart as well as beautifully animated.
All of those things being said, I have a two year old daughter, so I have seen
each Toy Story film around a hundred times a piece. In these repeated viewings I’ve noticed some
rather large plot holes that don’t really distract from the story so long as you
suspend disbelief, enjoy the story, and aren’t a nutter… but are there there
none the less.
#1: Buzz’s
Willful Ignorance
Movie: Toy
Story
Scene: The
first three quarters of the movie
How is it
that Buzz doesn’t notice that his wrist communicator is just a sticker? If he
is the real Buzz Lightyear then he must be a person in a space suit. Does he
not notice that he has no feeling of a body inside of the exterior suit since
he is solid plastic? Why doesn’t he notice that his space ship is made from
cardboard and lacks any kind of mechanical parts?
#2: How does
Woody not know his origin?
Movie: Toy
Story 2
Scene: The
premise of the movie, primarily the scene where Woody finds out he is based on
an old TV show called “Woody’s Roundup”.
In the
second film we find out that Woody is a priceless antique. He is a licensed
property based off of a presumably popular television show from decades ago.
The show is called Woody’s Round Up
and is in black and white and done with puppets (reminiscent of The Thunderbirds) so it’s safe to assume
the show is from the 1950’s (particularly since it is stated that the show’s
popularity waned because of the launch of Sputnik). We also know that the
show’s popularity, though intense, is short lived because it was cancelled on a
cliff hanger.
This makes
for a limited window of time in which Woody could have been manufactured and
sold. It also means that Woody is around
50 years old at. Andy’s mother states that he is a family heirloom, so he has
to have had multiple owners yet he acts as though he doesn’t understand the
idea of the child getting older and growing out of him. He has to have been handed down around 4
times. Does he not remember any of this? Why?
#3: Where
does toy sentience begin and end?
Movie: All
of them
Scene: All
of them
This is the
big one and perhaps the most insane for someone to be thinking about. We have
seen multiple times that toys can be dismantled and remain sentient. Buzz loses
his arm and doesn’t display any kind of pain. Woody also loses an arm. Toys can
be broken and fixed without any real consequence to the toy’s “health” or
“life”. Where does it end? The only time that any of the toy’s display pain is
when Sid burns Woody with a magnifying glass and even then he’s able to remain
inanimate. This one instance seems to contradict established cannon.
In the first
film, Sid completely dismantles toys and puts them back together in different
ways and they remain alive. Is he creating a new toy? A new consciousness?
These are often made of different toys put together, which personality does
that “new toy” have? Is the consciousness in the head? In the end of the third
film when the toys are about to slide into the incinerator at the dump, they’ll
be turned to ash, but since the toys have been dismantled without dying or
displaying symptoms of pain it’s reasonable to assume that ash may still have
some kind of sentience… that is a horrifying thought. How does a toy die?
Additionally
there is the question of where the consciousness begins. If I make a paper doll is that doll alive? Does the act of
drawing a face on paper make that face self aware? At what point during the
manufacturing process do the toys become living?
#4: Woody can control the pull string talk box
that’s in him… when it’s convenient to the plot.
Movie: Toy
Story
Scene: Woody
and Buzz are attempting to sneak down a hallway in Sid’s house quietly when
Woody’s pull string gets caught on a piece of stair railing and activates the
talk box, alerting the dog to their presence.
Okay
basically just read the bit where I explained the scene right there. Why can’t
Woody just make the talk box stop? It’s demonstrated later on when the toys are
revolting against Sid that he has control over it whether the string is pulled
or not.
#5: Why does Buzz go along with, what he interprets as, a pointless charade?
Movie: Toy
Story
Scene: Most
of the movie.
Why does
Buzz “play along” with the idea that he’s inanimate in front of Andy if he
believes that he is a space ranger? I mean, he believes that the fate of the entire universe relies on his getting off the planet quickly doesn't he?
#6: Illogical plans for plot's sake.
Movie: Toy
Story 2
Scene: Whole
movie.
It’s
demonstrated in the first Toy Story that there’s really no adverse effects to
revealing their sentience to a human. Why can’t this same plan apply to Al of
Al’s Toy Barn in the second film? No one’s going to believe him and he’s alone
in that store. I mean I know that as far as plot is concerned this would be
repetitive but logically in the context of the film it would seem like it would
be the most logical plan for the toys.
In
summation:
Well there
you are. The observances of a crazy person with regards to the Toy Story
franchise. I hope that you have enjoyed this list and that you can continue to
enjoy these wonderful films despite my insanity.
2 comments:
The best point that you have here is the' why does buzz play along' part. Good read sir.
Haha, thanks. I'm personally fond of #3 but that one's not particularly funny or observational... just insane. heh.
Post a Comment